Aquatic Facility Design Trends in British Columbia

by Vic Davies

The realization that swimming pools must cater to a wider variety of the population than just the competitive swimmer reached British Columbia in the early 1980’s when municipalities contemplating new aquatic facilities decided to follow the European trend of leisurization in aquatic facility design. Since then, great strides have been made in this province in facility planning, design and operation.

British Columbia is now leading Canada in this field. Design management professionals from all over the country are traveling to British Columbia’s aquatic facilities in ever increasing numbers to view the latest designs and operation techniques.

British Columbia’s aquatic facility design successes have also prompted interest worldwide. A recent newspaper headline in a Washington State daily newspaper read:

“Canadian Swimming Holes Draw Crowds from U.S.”

WATER PLAY: The W.C. Blair Recreation Centre Pool in Langley, BC attracts 200 Americans on holiday weekends, the centre’s office coordinator says. “The love the pool and they want one built real quick”, Phyllis Ebare says.

For the past three years design and operation professionals from Australia and New Zealand have conducted annual “information tours” of newly completed facilities in British Columbia and are now closely following these design trends “down under”.

Traditional pools, prior to the 1980’s, were designed primarily with the competitive swimmer in mind. The design pattern would follow a rectilinear form; its shape and size limited only be the population density served and the budget available. Designers would accept this status quo in plan form and concentrate on the shape of the building envelope in which to express themselves, designing the facility “from the outside in”. Of secondary importance, it seemed, was the forgotten potential of the pool user. Facilities were designed strictly with competition in mind. They lacked life, were cold, clinical, uninspiring and completely utilitarian in atmosphere.

Studies undertaken in the 70’s radically changed this school of thought when it was finally realized that only 5% of pool patrons used swimming pools for training and/or competitive purposes. The remaining 95% utilized pools for recreation, very much, it seemed, under great duress.

Something had to change.

The late 1960’s and 70’s in Europe had seen the introduction of “leisure pools” and they soon became a most important form of recreation for all ages and walks of life. Given impetus by Common Market funding, Britain seemed to welcome the challenge. The late 1970’s and 80’s saw intensive rivalry between towns and cities where each were constantly trying to upstage the other by creating monster aquatic “fun palaces”, in most instances costing upwards of $20 million. Completely forgotten was the plight of the swimmer; these aquatic palaces were created strictly for fun. Spaghetti waterslides, wave machines, river rapids, waterfalls and beaches dictated the scene. Provision for training and competition was lost.

Such developments in Europe helped shape the evolution and development of new aquatic facilities in British Columbia. A far greater awareness of the needs of all users was realized and the basic thrust of the British Columbia trend was to provide more of a compromise solution.

“Dual use” facilities were provided for leisure and competition. British Columbia municipalities had limited funds and the existing pools in the province were raking up major deficits. Greater thought had to be put into British Columbia design solutions. Better use of space, greater awareness of user requirements, user expectations, environmental sensitivity, access to all, fiscal responsibility, these were all the new common “buzz words” that suddenly appeared.

Maple Ridge Leisure Centre initiated the surge in 1980 and started a remarkable trend in aquatic design in British Columbia. Quesnel and Sparwood soon followed. Then came Grand Forks, Castlegar, Langley, Surrey, Tumbler Ridge, Chetwynd, Salmon Arm, Smithers and Gold River. British Columbia was on a roll. Many more have since followed and the latest designs have taken this province to new heights in facility provision and design solutions.

So what are we to expect for the future?

For the past decade British Columbia has clearly been doing things right and indications are that this province will continue to lead Canada in both creativity in design and possibly more importantly, fiscal responsibility.

Future facilities will have to cater to all and meet the needs of ever changing communities. With strained economy, no longer can aquatic facilities be seen as a drain on the taxpayer. Operating statistics must be addressed and facilities designed to become more self-supportive and cost effective. The Federal, Provincial and Local Governments have accepted this challenge and have addressed this problem with the two most recent major aquatic facilities in British Columbia—the 1993 Canada Games Pool in Kamloops and the 1994 Commonwealth Games Pool in Saanich. Both have been designed with major leisure components (Kamloops yet to be completed) for that elusive magical ingredient “life after the Games”.

Any new major competitive facilities will have to be regionalized. Existing outdated facilities will need to be retrofitted with a now well established and proven, “kit of retrofit parts”, designed to “humanize” the facility, increase user participation and enjoyment and (equally important) increase revenue.

This trend is already well underway in British Columbia and statistics gleaned from such pool retrofits already undertaken indicate remarkable increases in attendance and revenue, some resulting in a 4 to 6-year payback on investment. Powell River and McMillan Pool in Abbotsford attest to this fact. Ladysmith and Port Coquitlam will provide future examples for study.

Further aquatic facilities in British Columbia will be more entertainment oriented, with greater emphasis on family use and interactive water components.

Moving water has already become an essential ingredient of present day facilities. Saunas, steam rooms, swirl pools, poolside viewing terraces, bubble machines, waterslides, raindrop units, rapids channels, rubber rocks, weight rooms, fitness centres, and physiotherapy clinics have all found their way into the aquatic facility of the ’90s without inhibiting the training and competition amenities.

The future looks even more exciting, as new, previously uninitiated marriages of component parts continue to be introduced with great success.

“Theming” of facilities has successfully been introduced and has opened up a whole new dynamic form of expression within the facility. International themes line up with local pride and history to provide endless possibilities for interior decoration. “Imagineering” has come to the fore and, in conjunction with new technology, the sky’s the limit.

Be proud British Columbia. To date you have done everything right in aquatic centre design, development and management. The wealth of professionalism and dedication, clearly evident within the industry, will continue to ensure that British Columbia aquatic facilities will lead the world in innovation, design operation, management and cost effectiveness.

Vic Davies, MAIBC, REBA, MRAIC – Principal of Vic Davies Architect Ltd., Victoria, BC, specializes in the design of aquatic and leisure facilities worldwide. BC facilities with which he has been involved include:

  • Meadowpark Pool, Whistler
  • Coquitlam Pool
  • Saanich Commonwealth Place Leisure Pool
  • Kamloops Aquatic Centre
  • Matsqui Leisure Centre
  • Tumbler Ridge Aquatic Centre
  • Nicola Valley Aquatic Centre, Merritt
  • Maple Ridge Leisure Centre

Vic Davies can be reached at (250) 477-4255.

Published in Recreation BC, Winter 95

 

 

Go to VDA Corporate Web Site