Waves of the Future

Lets capture the ocean – Indoors!!

“If we can’t take the kids to the ocean, lets bring the ocean to the kids” – that’s the catch phrase now sweeping municipalities in Canada when they fully realized the benefits of installing an indoor wavepool in their general catchment area. The past decade in British Columbia alone has seen 8 such indoor facilities completed with another 4 presently on the drawing board. Alberta is fast following the trend.

Recreation and leisure swimming has been revolutionized throughout the country since the advent of the indoor wavepool in Canada during the mid ’80s. The wavepool has, without doubt, proven to be the Number 1 draw at municipal facilities which have taken the plunge and introduced surf into their once traditional, clinical and sterile competitive environment.

“Gimme the waves” is a common chant heard in British Columbia wavepools. Try getting the public out in a hurry – they’re hooked!!!

A sea of heads bobbing up and down in unison in a ram-jammed plethora of water – a typical sight on any day at any municipal wave pool in Canada.

Excitement abounds, shrieks are inevitable, enjoyment is guaranteed – whatever age one might be.

The ability to frolic at a beach, indoors at your favorite municipal pool, is now available and fast being adopted by budget conscious cities and towns eager to satisfy their residents, increase user generated revenue and thereby reduce operating deficits.

Progressive Canadian municipalities are considering new wavepool additions and/or retrofitting their existing stock to provide wave making capabilities.

The wave is on!!

Ever since Moses parted the waves in biblical times, man has had a fascination with moving water.

Many successful attempts have been made to capture the natural ocean phenomenon over the past 4 decades and utilize it indoors in a controlled environment. It has resulted in great strides in marine and ship design. The ability to study the effects of the ocean on coastal stability, harbours, breakwaters and jetties has been greatly enhanced through the ability to create wave simulation in a laboratory environment.

Pioneered in Europe, primarily Germany, Holland and the United Kingdom, the design of the wave machine has taken on many forms in recent years.

The earliest reports of its use in the United Kingdom date back to 1936 at the Porto Bello open air baths in Edinburgh. This was the only known pool with operational wave making equipment in the UK until the “surge” of new wave pool construction began in the early ’70s.

At that time there were only 3 established methods of successfully producing waves that were put to practical use:

  1. the “swing arm” type of equipment
  2. compressed air
  3. the reaction of a falling column of water

1. The "swing arm" type of equipment involved submerged, movable parts. This method has been somewhat abandoned over the years in favour of the more popular compressed air method since it involves less maintenance, is more economic, and has no submerged moving parts.

2. The compressed air method has since been extensively developed and has resulted in many patented systems which now create an infinite variety of wave patterns and sizes. Utilizing compressed air, the waves are initiated in a subdivided concrete chamber which will usually extend along the short side or “throat” of the pool. Compressed air is introduced on to the surface of water in the chambers creating oscillation of this water within the chambers which results in the wave generation in the pool.

3. The reaction of a falling column of water was first used in Arizona in the early ’70s in a large lagoon at Tempe. The lagoon was about 400 ft. (122m) x 300 ft. (92m) with a maximum depth of 9 ft. (2.7m) and was provided with water treatment equipment. The waves were 5 ft. (1.5m) high, so that surf riding could be indulged in. The water was pumped to a prearranged height at one end of the pool. It was then released through underwater gates and then, flowing over a weir (reef), formed the waves which swept across the lagoon. This method has also since been modified and further advanced over the years. Affectionately known in Britain as “the dump” it can now create tidal waves up to 10 ft. (3m) in height for boogie boarding and surfing. The use of this method is somewhat limited indoors however by virtue of the space required to achieve such large waves and the fact that they are sporadic in nature.

Recent exciting innovations in wave making technology include:

  • A circular sphere which can be introduced into a “traditional” pool and activated to generate waves on demand. The sphere can be used in any type of pool with no reconstruction necessary. In just minutes the ball will create waves which can be adjusted in size and shape to suit a program of choice. A Belgian invention and extensively used in Europe, it was recently successfully introduced to New Zealand at the Henderson Pool, Auckland, (the 1990 Commonwealth Games aquatic complex) to provide for additional; “life after the Games” recreational use.

  • A valve operated wave generation system that can be retrofitted within the confines of a traditional, existing pool tank. This system forces water through side vents into the pool thereby churning the surface. The waves can be set at varying heights and the system can be turned off when calm water is required. The waves can vary from 8 inches to 24 inches in height. To contain the waves a sectional perimeter wall system, a collar-like device is temporarily attached to the perimeter of the pool which can be quickly taken apart when the pool is converted back to waveless swimming.

There are other forms of wave generation. However, the foregoing summarizes those perhaps best suited to an indoor wave pool environment and consumers’ budgets.

In the ’70s and early ’80s wave machines were used extensively throughout the USA in outdoor water parks. Larger areas that were required to accommodate large pools to accommodate big waves had become the norm. 6,000 sq. ft. was the minimum area for a wavepool recommended by North American manufacturers and the wave would need to be 3 ft. – 4 ft. minimum in height.

To be successful indoors the outdoor wavepool had to be scaled down to a size both conducive to indoor use and to suit the municipal budget.

The Europeans had successfully scaled their equipment down since the mid ’70s during the “indoor wavepool mania” that seemed to strike during that time.

So, it was to European manufacturers and the European technology that most Canadian pool designers initially turned to produce the equipment for use in wavepools in Canada.

Smaller waves, 600mm to 1m in height, became the accepted and recommended size to suit smaller (3,000 – 4,000 sq. ft.) indoor wavepools, to minimize freeboard around the pool and reduce the “cavern like” effect of perimeter walls. (The freeboard is the height required to contain the waves and is usually one half the height of the wave generated.).

Other things were introduced into Canadian designed wavepools to make them more exciting and not “just waves”:

  • Rapid channels, to catch a piece of the wave and regenerate it back onto itself to create more interesting areas of “splash” within the pool.
  • Underwater ledges, weirs, islands, boats, decorative features and interactive waterplay devices to create interest and exciting places and areas of respite within the waves – all to provide that “entertainment factor” and simulate more closely the natural phenomenon of the far off ocean shores.
  • Extensive deck level access points to ease access into the water and nullify the freeboard at specific points of entry.
  • The utilization of the wave equipment air compressor for other uses within the pool – bubble machines, etc.
  • Theming was introduced to give character and identity to public spaces by adding artifacts and particular design features true to a period, place or story.

The result – our neighbours south of the border were visiting Canadian facilities (particularly in British Columbia) in large numbers to see how it was done and very soon we had alternate U.S. sources for those scaled down wave machines – at scaled down prices.

Who had ever heard of Coquitlam, Matsqui, Langley, Saanich, Richmond?… yet they are all now on the essential “tour list” for most international indoor leisure pool designers, municipal staff and politicians when they visit British Columbia to specifically review successful indoor wavepool facilities. Washington State and Oregon are the latest to see some of the indoor wavepool benefits (year round access to the ocean) for a climate much like our own and have started to build such exciting facilities in their states.

The Canadian style wavepool phenomenon is also having a tsunami effect elsewhere around the world. New Zealanders discovered the benefits of the wavepool only 4 years ago after visiting British Columbian facilities. In far away New Zealand they have already constructed 5 exciting wavepools in that time, have 2 more under construction and many others at design and design development stage.

Despite all the above, the indoor wavepool is, as yet, in its infancy in Canada but the baby is here to stay and is growing fast. Certainly it is the wave of the future.

“If we can’t take the kids to the ocean” – The message to all Canadian and American municipalities is coming over loud and clear …“Let’s bring the ocean to the kids”. See you there; let’s all make waves!!

Vic Davies, President of Vic Davies Architect Ltd., Victoria, British Columbia, specializes in leisure, recreation and aquatic centre design in Canada, USA, New Zealand and Australia and has been responsible for many successful and exciting wavepool designs throughout the world.

Published in Cornerstones, A Fitness, Facility & Recreation Management Journal Vol. 4 Issue 2

 

Go to VDA Corporate Web Site